I don’t see the hype about women with no pubes.
I understand trimming it so you don’t have an unmanageable bush, but why would you be turned on by a woman who has a vagina that looks like a pre-pubescent girl… unless you were a gross pedo?
Because, generally speaking, those are the only people who have no pubes.
It feels vaguely pedophilic. I also find it bizarre that this expectation only seems to apply to women. Guys can have a huge ol’ bush down there…
I refuse to do anything but trim, and when I’m into a woman (since I’m bi), her having no pubes is a turn off.
Hi how are you your opinion is pretty garbage and let me tell you why.
While biologically speaking pretty much only prepubescent humans lack pubes (though there are different disorders and forms of hair loss that can cause this) the removal of pubic hair is historically noted and it often has nothing to do with being ‘child like’, rather, it is done for sensation.
So please shut your mouth. It’s fine to think that a bush is more appealing to you, but if someone likes the way oil, lotion, lube, saliva, vaginal fluids or cum feels sliding against smooth skin, or if they like the way smooth skin feels against satin, silk, etc and so they choose to shave, that does not make them a pedophile and frankly the fact that you class anyone who likes these things as a pedo just shows that you know very little about sex and the variety of ways people enjoy sexual stimulation.
Furthermore I haven’t seen a mainstream porno with a dude with a full bush in forever so you’re wrong about that, too, surprise surprise.